<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Weather Madness | mikesizemo | Activity</title>
	<link>https://weathermadness.com/members/mikesizemo/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://weathermadness.com/members/mikesizemo/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for mikesizemo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:31:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79aeb9ac246a5d3dbbfc84afdb18de80</guid>
				<title>Am I missing something or is the Daily Newsletter lacking a Link to a text write-up today?  All I am seeing are the maps.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/34908/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:31:40 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Am I missing something or is the Daily Newsletter lacking a Link to a text write-up today?  All I am seeing are the maps.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca1f52b589ab0c9f634d277b15ca051b</guid>
				<title>Well, that certainly looks like a Retrograding Block to me, so maybe it works its way back further west than the models show right now in quicker fashion.  Irregardless, it should eventually get back in a more favorable position at some point in the Week 3/4 timeframe.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/34172/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:57:04 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Well, that certainly looks like a Retrograding Block to me, so maybe it works its way back further west than the models show right now in quicker fashion.  Irregardless, it should eventually get back in a more favorable position at some point in the Week 3/4 timeframe.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7bc3d0352ea2aa7b5ab338fd2a7f781</guid>
				<title>I don&#039;t buy the NAM.  As a matter of fact, I usually don&#039;t buy much of anything ran off the NCEP Suite of Model Guidance.  Billions and billions of dollars spent and what we have here is a national embarrassment.  End of rant</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/29135/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 22:16:35 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>I don&#8217;t buy the NAM.  As a matter of fact, I usually don&#8217;t buy much of anything ran off the NCEP Suite of Model Guidance.  Billions and billions of dollars spent and what we have here is a national embarrassment.  End of rant</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f5d400ecd3ab08cc6a4f8fd30073a147</guid>
				<title>The European Model has historically had a bias towards holding back energy in the Southwestern United States.  Accordingly, the European Model will sometimes diverge from the U.S. Model by being both slower to bring systems out of the Southwest and tend to phase those features with the Northern Branch and then lose the phasing, simply to bring it back as the event draws closer.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/24121/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 16:58:01 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>The European Model has historically had a bias towards holding back energy in the Southwestern United States.  Accordingly, the European Model will sometimes diverge from the U.S. Model by being both slower to bring systems out of the Southwest and tend to phase those features with the Northern Branch and then lose the phasing, simply to bring it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24121"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/24121/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">353f245ab64649a82b3db7d6eb2a3a99</guid>
				<title>Perhaps, the persistence of the PNA in the Negative Phase is because what has been a Semi-Permanent Ridge in the Southwest Atlantic simply doesn&#039;t want to give up for the Winter.  If true, the strength of any such Ridge in combination with the cold air surges brought down due to La Nina would dictate the outcome of the Winter in the I-95 Corridor.  The bottom line is a +PNA is not always good for Winter weather (Snow) and a Negative PNA is not always a killer for Winter weather along the East Coast.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/23196/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:37:20 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Perhaps, the persistence of the PNA in the Negative Phase is because what has been a Semi-Permanent Ridge in the Southwest Atlantic simply doesn&#8217;t want to give up for the Winter.  If true, the strength of any such Ridge in combination with the cold air surges brought down due to La Nina would dictate the outcome of the Winter in the I-95 Corridor.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23196"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/23196/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e29498fd71cca72db2f928359ba0caeb</guid>
				<title>Another possible explanation for the divergent results in the modeling from run-to-run could be an impending pattern change that the models are having difficulty resolving.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/22481/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 13:34:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Another possible explanation for the divergent results in the modeling from run-to-run could be an impending pattern change that the models are having difficulty resolving.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4af710da8997061141a9fe9903dff72</guid>
				<title>I would have to spend some time and research the correlations between &quot;Dry&quot; Octobers and the following Winters.  But, if memory serves me correctly, I believe Octobers with below average precipitation usually are followed by Winters that are warmer than the 30-year average at that particular geographical location.  Has anyone else out there done any research or review of the historical records in regard to this topic?</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/22243/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:43:17 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>I would have to spend some time and research the correlations between &#8220;Dry&#8221; Octobers and the following Winters.  But, if memory serves me correctly, I believe Octobers with below average precipitation usually are followed by Winters that are warmer than the 30-year average at that particular geographical location.  Has anyone else out there done&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-22243"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/22243/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3faa8522fe3a7b9d0c59b694e5cd2729</guid>
				<title>I don&#039;t believe MJO Phases 4, 5 and 6 are &quot;Cold Phases&quot; for the Eastern U.S.  In the late Fall or early in the Winter, Phase 7 can result in some Eastern Cold and later in the Winter and early Spring, Phase 3 is a relatively Cold Phase.  But, during the heart of Winter, it is Phases 8, 1, and 2 which produce the dips in the Jet Stream owing to the Upper Motion in the tropics which just happen to be the Phases for hurricanes during the Hurricane Season.  At least, that is what I remember, but my memory isn&#039;t as good as it used to be, LOL.  But, if we can get a Negative EPO, the MJO Phases might not mean much in the outcome.  The only issue is that MJO Phases generally tends to drive the EPO Phase.  The moral of the story is its Fool&#039;s Gold to bet against the input out of the tropics.  I have been burned many times in my thinking betting against the MJO.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/17920/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2024 21:29:04 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>I don&#8217;t believe MJO Phases 4, 5 and 6 are &#8220;Cold Phases&#8221; for the Eastern U.S.  In the late Fall or early in the Winter, Phase 7 can result in some Eastern Cold and later in the Winter and early Spring, Phase 3 is a relatively Cold Phase.  But, during the heart of Winter, it is Phases 8, 1, and 2 which produce the dips in the Jet Stream owing to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-17920"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/17920/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">163e662e896e984a75fcaff08bc78e0b</guid>
				<title>Frankly, we are now getting very close to the point (about March 1st) where I really couldn&#039;t care less about Winter weather.  And, this is not a new point of view, I have held for decades now.  Once, we get past the Holidays and January, snow and cold become increasingly a nuisance to be tolerated.  The translation is - I am honestly not disappointed by any coming periods of warmer weather, it just makes life a little easier and it is easy on the heating bills.  In December, I was and would be disappointed, but we are past all of that now.  LOL.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/16926/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:51:29 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Frankly, we are now getting very close to the point (about March 1st) where I really couldn&#8217;t care less about Winter weather.  And, this is not a new point of view, I have held for decades now.  Once, we get past the Holidays and January, snow and cold become increasingly a nuisance to be tolerated.  The translation is &#8211; I am honestly not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16926"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/16926/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">430b260e70f1a9ab667ea59f388a4418</guid>
				<title>Perhaps, the CFS Model is telling us that a substantial snow cover gets put down which acts to mute the impact of the relaxation of the pattern.  So, at the upper levels, the pattern relaxes.  But, at 2 Meters, we don&#039;t get what MJO Phases 4, 5 and 6 might usually give us.  If the MJO is rotating through quickly, we are back into the Cold Phases of the MJO with a set of Indices to match.  I guess what I am saying is the &quot;Warm Up Period&quot; might just end up being less cold, but with plenty of winter weather still around in the Central and East.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/14634/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 21:38:47 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Perhaps, the CFS Model is telling us that a substantial snow cover gets put down which acts to mute the impact of the relaxation of the pattern.  So, at the upper levels, the pattern relaxes.  But, at 2 Meters, we don&#8217;t get what MJO Phases 4, 5 and 6 might usually give us.  If the MJO is rotating through quickly, we are back into the Cold Phases&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14634"><a target="_blank" href="https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/14634/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read More</a></span></p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b7541fb3123ce03a96a05bbcb26e6de5</guid>
				<title>Perhaps, looking at the SOI values from the Winter of 1977-1978 might yield some clues.  As I recall, it was a weak El Nino and Central-Based.  The Winter sort of spurted until 1/8/1978 and then took off for 60 days in grand fashion.  I don’t know if Queensland has those daily values archived or if they were doing the calculations back then.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/12496/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 15:29:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>Perhaps, looking at the SOI values from the Winter of 1977-1978 might yield some clues.  As I recall, it was a weak El Nino and Central-Based.  The Winter sort of spurted until 1/8/1978 and then took off for 60 days in grand fashion.  I don’t know if Queensland has those daily values archived or if they were doing the calculations back then.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">82cfa4fc3697aad54bfb981038477aae</guid>
				<title>The truth is no two El Ninos are the same.  It would be instructive to go back and look at the Winters of 1969-1970, 1972-1973, 1976-1977 and 1977-1978 and observe just how different those Winters were in both the Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast, including the I-95 Corridor.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/11699/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:52:41 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>The truth is no two El Ninos are the same.  It would be instructive to go back and look at the Winters of 1969-1970, 1972-1973, 1976-1977 and 1977-1978 and observe just how different those Winters were in both the Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast, including the I-95 Corridor.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3beac632efdf8cd9c5a8955cb18d418c</guid>
				<title>It will shift east, shift east, shift east, but in the end, it will be coming back West by the time we get to the Friday and Saturday model runs because the GFS is almost always too far south and too far east from 4 to 5 days out.</title>
				<link>https://weathermadness.com/activity/p/1619/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 04:55:58 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="activity-inner"><p>It will shift east, shift east, shift east, but in the end, it will be coming back West by the time we get to the Friday and Saturday model runs because the GFS is almost always too far south and too far east from 4 to 5 days out.</p>
</div><div class="youzify-post-attachments"></div>]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>